Image default
Archive

Is the Richmond Terminal Warehouse to be demolished?

Related posts

Reminder: Inlight Richmond is THIS Weekend!

Church Hill People's News
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

12 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
ray
ray
2 years ago

Couple of things:

1) Seems everything other wharehouse in the city has been preserved, so what’s so bad about this one that it can’t?

2) Why is the City even paying for Stone to have a restaurant? We built them the brewing facility, Stone’s is a big corporation that has plenty of money, so why can’t they pay for it themselves?

Just wondering.

Dana Bagby
Dana Bagby
2 years ago

I love how the terminal is called an eyesore, as if Stone’s hi-gloss cement facade is wonderful-looking. Two eyesores: a theme emerges.

Chris
Chris
2 years ago

Looks like a building from Full Metal Jacket.

MJR
MJR
2 years ago

Agree with Ray. Everything about this Stone Brewing deal continues to reek of corporate welfare.

Jamaal Mayes
Jamaal Mayes
2 years ago
Reply to  Dana Bagby

You are right, Stones building is ugly

Dave Seibert
Dave Seibert
2 years ago

I hope they build back something similar.

B_Brodie
B_Brodie
2 years ago

an inconvenient truth: it costs money to preserve historical artifacts. why did this company even get this sweetheart deal? they just don’t want to keep with their end of the deal. privatize the profits, socialize the losses. same thing going on with the westhampton school, bon secours wants to knock it down because it costs money to preserve historical artifacts and they don’t want to spend the money. they’d rather throw up (pun intended) some brutalist uglified st mary’s-esque cement and brick tower on that site and erase the school completely. and, mayor stoney + city council will probably let… Read more »

CQ
CQ
2 years ago

Why would you plan all the way to the last light fixture when you have not determine that the columns are structurally sound? Did it take you 4 years to find out the columns need reinforcement, yet you already spend money on “the last chair”? Seems not right.

G_Smith
G_Smith
2 years ago

The building has been abandoned for a very long time,it is an eyesore, has no architectural features worth preserving. Sorry, sometimes you have to take out the old and bring in new. BTW, Stone got a deal yes, but they also have improved a bad section of town, and yes I can say that because I have lived up the hill from there for over 15 years. Has the CHA ever suggested anything to improve the area down there? No, they haven’t. Let these people at least make use of the area and generate taxes for the city, at least… Read more »

Alix B.
Alix B.
2 years ago

This isn’t really a mystery. It’s been reported by numerous publications that there are structural deficiencies and the building will be demolished. It has also been reported in multiple places that the city pays $8 million, which it gets back in rent from Stone, over the years. Stone pays anything past $8million for new building — which will be 12,000 square feet ( more than half the size of current warehouse).

Nikki Daniels
Nikki Daniels
2 years ago

I think its sad first we can’t fish down there no more now they wanna tear down some history wth

12
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x