Image default
Archive

Pate seeking to rezone Mosby Street property

IMAGE via Rob Pate

Rob Pate owns the former ACME grocery store at Mosby and Venable. The property consists of 2 addresses – 2000 Venable Street/701 Mosby Street and 707 Mosby Street. Pate is asking the zoning board to allow retail use at the 600 square foot storefront at 707 Mosby Street.

The 707 parcel has no available parking, and Pate says that he has no prospects on renting any nearby. As zoned 707 Mosby Street can only be used as residence, Pate says. “Which would be lousy,”

Vacant since a fire in 2009, Pate says prospective tenants have proposed using the storefront as a musical instrument store, an ice cream shop, a grab and go bakery, a custom stationary store, and doughnut shop.

The other, larger parcel at 2000 Venable Street/701 Mosby Street is a 1500 square foot corner store that is zoned R-63, meaning that it can by-right be utilized as a restaurant, convenience store, retail, office, coffee shop or several other things with no parking requirements.

[sep]

[sep]

Related posts

List of streets that might be named after Confederates

Church Hill People's News

CAR to consider new mixed-use for Venable Street

Church Hill People's News

For Sale: $2,500,000

Church Hill People's News
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

25 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Daniil Kleyman
Daniil Kleyman
2020 years ago

FB_1042595232512589

Tara FitzPatrick
Tara FitzPatrick
2020 years ago

FB_10212011733310974

Joshua Champagne
Joshua Champagne
2020 years ago

FB_1528534177160811

Mike Neuroth
Mike Neuroth
2020 years ago

FB_10212038544739749

Ricky Thompkins
Ricky Thompkins
2020 years ago

FB_463215814015287

Union Hill Rachel
Union Hill Rachel
3 years ago

I love this property. It has so much potential. I look forward to seeing what transpires. I hope the picture is a hint of what is planned.

urbngrilla
urbngrilla
3 years ago

Thumbs up to rezoning the smaller parcel for retail use with NO off street parking requirements. Rob, are you asking for R63? Or UB zoning classification. God-speed in your endeavors!

Ashley Dawn Goodmundson
Ashley Dawn Goodmundson
3 years ago

Awesome. Cool idea. Love the neighborhood this time of year.

Sarah Blackburn
Sarah Blackburn
2020 years ago

FB_10103757022418975

larry horton
larry horton
3 years ago

add 2 stories on the existing footprint for more density

Marilyn Stroh
Marilyn Stroh
3 years ago

Loads of good things happening over there. Good luck Rob!

Ronst Klementi
Ronst Klementi
2020 years ago

FB_10103840619644496

Dave Seibert
Dave Seibert
3 years ago

Good luck Rob! Totally agree that that back portion should be commercial.

Daniel
Daniel
3 years ago

Glad to see something put on this lot!

Has anyone else noticed that cars are always parked on mosby street (900-1100 block) in the evening between 4-6pm across from the school illegally EVERY DAY?

I guess the RPD just doesn’t does have the man power to enforce things like parking violations?

CJ Walker
CJ Walker
3 years ago

I can definitely see a restaurant there. Maybe if that other convenience store behind the property was not there, a parking lot could go there. Just a thought

Eric Huffstutler
Eric Huffstutler
3 years ago

Am I loosing something in translation here about 707? That too has always been commercial, built as a barber shop I believe? How can they consider it residential?

Eric Huffstutler
Eric Huffstutler
3 years ago

BTW, I love the open greenhouse look of the larger building. 🙂

David Seibert
David Seibert
2020 years ago

FB_10157907938490425

Courtney Monaghan
Courtney Monaghan
2020 years ago

FB_10102131345359068

Michael Grabow
Michael Grabow
2020 years ago

FB_10202668046299955

L
L
3 years ago

@Eric – Once a building has been vacant for a certain number of years (three, I believe), the right to uses which don’t conform with zoning expires

On a related note, I wonder if Rob Pate has considered requesting a restoration of nonconforming use? Might not work in this case/might not offer enough flexibility, but supposedly it is a much easier/cheaper/quicker process than getting an SUP or Rezoning.

Eric Huffstutler
Eric Huffstutler
3 years ago

@11 ‘L’, thanks for the information. How unfortunate that I see that it is zoned R-63 Residential (Multi-family Urban) but the building is listed as a C02 – Commercial Shell. The property was business as far back as the 1870s at least and the current building has always been a business and only designed as such. I don’t see how there could be any problem having this rezoned? Why would it have changed anyway, especially since it is all business on the opposite corner and street?

Rob Pate
Rob Pate
3 years ago

Thanks to all for the thoughtful comments and questions. I haven’t responded because I plain DID NOT know what zoning was talking about. Still dont, but the board agreed to my request! They had a lively discussion of what was going on with the property zoning and it seems it should never have been rezoned as r-63. Letters were mailed to all owner’s addresses within 150 feet of the property and no one showed up to speak. (alot of those owners were LLCs and other investor names). Anyway the small storefront is now available for your favorite entrepreneur! Rent (for… Read more »

Eric S. Huffstutler
Eric S. Huffstutler
2 years ago

I am excited to see the walls opening up on the larger building for the greenhouse look. Progress being made. Any tenant prospects yet?

V. Mullins
V. Mullins
2 years ago

There’s a sign up, but it’s too small for me to read. Anyone know what it’s gonna be?

25
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x