The Urban Design Committee takes up the pedestrian plazas of the proposed Church Hill North Culinary Complex at their Thursday, March 9, 2017 meeting.
The design is way beyond the brick rectangle:
The Markels worked with O’Neill McVoy Architects, who are a part of the design team for the VCU Institute of Contemporary Art (ICA), to design the culinary school building. The Markels share the City’s dream for this project being an integral part of the ongoing dynamic growth and expanding vitality of the Church Hill community. They also have a desire that its architecture capture and reflect the excellence of the J. Sargeant Reynolds Culinary Institute, and make it an icon for decades to come of the transformational power of education and healthy dietary choices. At the same time the project must have a human scale, be inviting to the community, and become a part of its fabric. It must have the ability to attract prospective culinary students from Church Hill community as well as the entire Commonwealth of Virginia and beyond; to form a landmark presence on the important urban corner of 25th Street and 9 Mile Road.
The development will include the culinary school, 11,200 SF for private restaurants, 50,796 SF for 49 apartments, and 7,800 SF for retail space. J. Sargent Reynolds Culinary Institute will anchor the culinary complex development.
[sep]
163 comments
FB_1411830358849226
FB_10208100255960527
FB_10154846943941742
FB_10211873307649064
FB_10154911884342211
FB_1693042007584922
FB_10211362437438402
FB_10106369405407982
FB_10153905660740834
FB_10103179327938136
FB_10211190521624643
FB_974630930345
FB_10208566741262832
FB_10154809893149439
FB_10155217249747259
FB_10212305322930845
FB_10154235980548590
FB_10211209940587617
FB_10154982307086015
FB_10103945329654796
FB_10154554947267983
FB_10208168376343470
FB_10212391459443081
FB_10206836177022754
FB_10210706433679135
FB_10154559431538472
FB_10211028414099225
FB_10212280325792704
FB_10211913259128604
FB_385491988484024
FB_10154893466154090
FB_10202668046299955
FB_10202520247683271
FB_10212003140334598
FB_10157907938490425
FB_10211812290045782
FB_10209683129469368
FB_10155791170071102
FB_10209823421996836
FB_10153938983366213
FB_10103779252878986
FB_10154908894466151
FB_10154614598065240
FB_10212014625546500
FB_10210348472899989
FB_10155772803914896
FB_10100527353506401
FB_10106373988303822
FB_10105354982089823
FB_1869507123336023
FB_10210711718181789
FB_10155579159795656
FB_1677008272325795
FB_10100779951058939
FB_10154469195787613
FB_10207838239985004
FB_10103700443638336
FB_10155351139450110
FB_10155263859739610
FB_10154172584736954
FB_10103945553306596
FB_10158224867900623
FB_10212006297932713
FB_10154910832050196
FB_1325360677507730
FB_1434528256557233
FB_10106374228043382
FB_10212294978635532
FB_10154427264452833
FB_10210620407283034
FB_10103763846643206
FB_1443670182333443
FB_1229164967129314
FB_10211121457084898
FB_10154412972553527
FB_10101125637879537
FB_10209774429175794
FB_10210713373742946
FB_1396932563653152
FB_267295493714489
FB_344977312554674
FB_1915882435297969
FB_10211653368306868
FB_10154352429889107
FB_10208810448840902
FB_10102004965585003
FB_10209766664696690
FB_10212497313734891
FB_932667889101
FB_10209853184585047
FB_1256667827712502
FB_10211746873845288
FB_1631001943591811
FB_1333188230066674
FB_1528534177160811
FB_10154754428057088
FB_306478566434235
FB_394186880940301
FB_10211852846896385
FB_1860326547570015
FB_10104928852207735
FB_10154159306857041
FB_10101971744280664
FB_10155299793611062
FB_10202758281074434
FB_10207656004989348
FB_10212147144733311
FB_10212398646459034
FB_10211169633069529
FB_10213257934229096
FB_10212042621083558
FB_10207941396596084
FB_1474911842527332
FB_10154388163953994
FB_1353928044654080
FB_10154150990097237
FB_248357418953861
FB_10155088460214268
FB_10207946233118922
FB_10154910719895792
FB_10210756506540185
FB_10208286153806760
FB_10202657240627772
FB_1846836388908051
FB_10154733781698110
FB_10206679424464886
FB_1558971420787493
I need to sit with this for a minute…
is it suppose to look like a green house sitting atop train crates??
I love it! I’m a big fan of the historic look of church hill and don’t like it when developers try to do modern up here b/c it always just looks cheap and thought out. This is purposeful and will be a great contrast to the rest of the neighborhood.
LOVE
Finally something besides a box with metal and wood siding.
This is a statement.
Now work to relocate all the subsidized housing from prime interstate interchange locations to open it to tax producing real estate development so the city can increase its income. Richmond has way too much public housing taking up important space in the city.
Time to move on.
Outstanding (y)
Where does this sit? This appears to take over the spot where the current municipal building stands.
NM, got it, further down 25th.
Yesss
WOW!!! That’s wow in a good way.
This is way more appropriate for this historical area than those other projects posted yesterday, especially the one near Sub Rosa!
Wonderful! The Markels are a blessing to this city.
^ Well isn’t that special?
Wow! Nice look but that’s a hell of place to put it!
What happened to the idea of an actual grocery store? Seems way more useful.
@sarah – the grocery store is still coming, you can see its footprint as the grey building in the 2nd image. These are linked, complementary projects.
Sarah the grocery store will be across the street.
I like it but I am absolutely fascinated that generally people agree that this good but the Jefferson Avenue project is an abomination.
JSR must be doing well. This structure doesn’t look cheap.
Yes!
Fabulous
@BAF, I agree! I thought this whole thread would be a copycat of the Jefferson thread. I am surprised that it is not – and I think this is a little more out of place than the Jefferson project. (Not saying I don’t like it – I do)
@BAF @Liz – you guys don’t get it. This culinary institute is “over there” – you know – surrounded by poor people. Yes, it’s still a historic area, but it’s not on OUR block so who cares? Stick a tall, spaceship-looking lego set building over there around all those poor folk? Absolutely! Put a few buildings that actually fit but may be 1-story too tall on our block? NIMBY!!!
I’d love to read the design brief for this project – the glass will connect to the outside community. Truly, truly hope the longterm outcome is reducing the instances of diabetes in the eastend. But that won’t happen until craptactular food choices are removed along with behavior change. In the meantime, I may get some candy with my hooka and watch this slowly unfold. The laundromat and Dollar General need to step it up because they are going to be the “ugly” side of the circle soon.
The shape is interesting. In a good way. The materials look cheap in the rendering. Perhaps that is just because it is a preliminary drawing. Can’t say for sure.
As for comparing this to the Jefferson & M project… Let’s be honest. 9-mile road is among the most destitute looking roads in the entire east end. Essentially barely anything of architectural note and buildings are spread out due to vast assemblages of vacant lots. The side streets may have some charming blocks but Nine Mile itself looks like a waste land. So it is not an apples-to-apples comparison to Jefferson Ave in terms of existing character/charm. I think it is perfectly reasonable to have higher expectation for new development on Jefferson Ave.
This location is actually outside the Union Hill and Church Hill North Old & Historic Districts. Commission of Architectural Review has no purview and the developer has no obligation to Historic guidelines.
Personally looking at this makes me so grateful to live in an Old & Historic District. Why 70’s plastic covered couch orange? Yikes.
@DontMinceWords you can read the project plan here under the ‘Location & Plans’ link:
https://richmondva.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=2976108&GUID=146D5667-4961-427E-87DF-927BF814D970&Options=&Search=
Great! As one of the "poor people" over here, it meets with my approval.
@Jesse English
Maybe we can give them some blankets with small pox to get them off the land?
Hello. For over a decade we have been searching for a community-accessible site to expand our culinary arts programming. For various reasons, our classes are currently situated on the 6th Floor of our Downtown Campus at 7th & Jackson Streets. We quickly outgrew the space as our educational work proved successful and knew we had to find a new home. We began to seek a location that welcomed community members (professional and otherwise) to visit, sample student cooking, and access classes more readily. We studied historical student demographics and learned that many of our students come from the East End of Richmond. Our graduates are sought by many of RVA’s best kitchens and for decades we have provided an onramp to self-sufficiency for these graduates. I believe our new location will amplify the benefits to our community. Another exciting feature will be our urban farming instructional programming. Our Goochland Campus offers a world-class sustainable agriculture program, but the commute to Goochland is formidable for many in our service region. We have designed green spaces and a culinary greenhouse at the new center and look forward to a farm-to-table presence in the neighborhood and our classrooms.
I have confidence that Jim’s Market, Parsley’s Center for Healthy Communities, and the Reynold’s Culinary Center will form a nexus of affordable food, affordable education and lifestyle programming in a manner responsive to the community.
Until the center opens, there are a variety of instructional options for you and your friends. We currently offer classes that lead to a Culinary Arts AAS Degree, Hospitality Management AAS Degree or Pastry Arts Career Studies Certificate. These and several new offerings will be available at the new center, but why wait? You can learn more and view our Summer Semester 2017 schedule at http://www.reynolds.edu/get_started/programs/business/culinary_and_hospitality/default.aspx and http://www.reynolds.edu/register_for_classes/schedules.aspx
David Barrish, M.P.A., CHA
Dean
School of Business
Reynolds Community College
David, you have been doing an amazing job for the last 30 years that I’ve known you. I’m so glad that you have a home that you can grow in to. Best of success in the new space.
@BAF @LIZ @MIKE
I have a very mixed opinion about the M Street project and a much more positive (initial) opinion about this project. Architecturally, there are four schools of thought for designing for infill in historic districts, which can roughly be described as “Replication/Historicism,” “Invention Within a Style,” “Compatible but Differentiated,” and “Direct Opposition.”
The M street project is nice, but mediocre because it is required by CAR to be “Compatible but Differentiated.” This means the developer cannot do anything innovative or unusual, but also cannot imitate (accurately or interpretively) historic styles in any meaningful way. This is also why the project has been such a PR Cluster#### – CAR’s requirements run counter to the public expectation’s vis-à-vis CAR’s mission and purpose.
The project at Nine Mile is much better for several reasons, but primarily because it is not held to the restrictions imposed on the Jefferson Avenue/M St project. Consequently, J Sargent Reynolds can be much more creative with their design.
The comparison between these two projects and public reception of them reinforces my opinion that the community needs to work to change CAR’s guidelines. Imitation/Historicist buildings and buildings which are in Direct Opposition to Historicist styles seem to be much more popular/aesthetically appealing/whatever to the general public than “Compatible but Differentiated” buildings, which only seem to appeal to academics and architects.
The following link from the Preservation Alliance of Philadelphia contains references to the work of Steven W Semes, which is helpful for fleshing out the distinction between the different types of architectural “philosophies” available for infill development. (For whatever reason, his original work on infill strategy is widely referenced, but hard to find!) Also, I freely admit that I am not an architect or in anyway credentialed or qualified to comment, just a keenly interested observer…
http://www.preservationalliance.com/publications/SenseofPlace_final.pdf
@ Lee. I’m so confused by all of this…does the problem really lie with CAR on some of these designs?
There are some really good examples of nice infill projects in the neighborhood and they blend seamlessly with the surrounding properties.. The real estate office building that went up a few years ago on (I want to say) 22nd street is a great example- it looks like it could have been there for a hundred years. That building mimics many old design features yet, it’s brand new. I assume it passed muster with CAR.
BHC houses, many of them going up in North Church Hill, seem to replicate a traditional Richmond row house yet they seem to miss the mark so often with scale, fenestration, materials, etc. Usually the distance between the 2nd story front windows and the frieze beneath the bracketed cornice is too much– it looks out of place. Reminds me of Herman Munster’s forehead…
There are other architectural styles to draw from other than modern box–Richmond architects don’t do them well. Other historic areas in cities up and down the east coast seem to have an easier time with infill projects and additions to existing structures.
People in and of the community, I read your comments..some favorable and some not so favorable. As a resident who has lived her entire life in this community, it’s a blessing to see the emerging of new ideas and forthcoming structures.
I have a dream as well as other residents that we “poor” people will experience the enjoyment of new and rehab buildings in this community and the revitalization of 25th Street. We have lived with the problem(s) since the late 70’s, sat at the table making plans for new & rehabbed homes. It’s our time to make where we live come alive.
To those of you who speak negatively of this project, open your minds and pray for the success of the store and the culinary complex that is forthcoming. May I say with great passion, if you can’t help the situation, please don’t hinder progress.
Thanks to the Markels for having a heart to reach out to the community and to help affect the lives of others.
Another comment made by one of you addressing prime real estate where public housing now exists, all I can say is your mind is on the economic aspect with no consideration for the lives of “poor people”. I don’t advocate public housing but I will fight for those who want to experience the joy of living in a home or apartment just like you and me. I look forward to the demise of public housing entirely and not relocation. In the East End, we have lived with too many of these structures and now it’s time for change.
@Kay9
CAR incorporates a variety of elements from the National Parks Service Guidelines for rehabilitation and additions/new construction in historic districts in CAR Guidelines. This includes the idea the idea that new structures should be “compatible but differentiated.” The way this is typically interpreted, groups like CAR appear to think the best way to protect historic districts is by ensuring that any new construction or additions are sufficiently distinct that folks won’t be misled into thinking that new buildings have always been there. It seems this runs counter to the public’s expectation that an organization like CAR is supposed to make sure that new buildings blend in with/look like historic buildings.
Basically, CAR does a great job of protecting existing buildings, but doesn’t really seem to do a great job with regards to infill. I shouldn’t speak out of turn regarding the real estate building on 22nd that you referenced, but I am under the impression that it was built by someone who knew the ins and outs of dealing with CAR and was able to get what they wanted. I think that building is a great example of the kinds of buildings CAR should be approving as compatible infill
CAR needs to get its act together or just git.
M street project looks exactly like Short pump or some of the less appealing VCU dorms. There’s no need for a committee that says yes to that sort of thing. I like that there is a building going in there, but I’ve seen more interesting parking garages.
I love the J Sarge building. It’ll be a landmark. It’s brave and fun. I’m looking forward to taking my kid to see it in progress and completed. If our esteemed committee is standing in the way of that kind of thinking further down the hill, it should sit down.
” I shouldn’t speak out of turn regarding the real estate building on 22nd that you referenced, but I am under the impression that it was built by someone who knew the ins and outs of dealing with CAR and was able to get what they wanted. I think that building is a great example of the kinds of buildings CAR should be approving as compatible infill”
And I’ll bet this building received no complaints or any sort of opposition from other stakeholders in the area. This should be a sign to CAR that this is consistent with the wants and desires of the neighborhood when considering new infill or additions. There are countless examples of beautiful 19th century buildings with absolutely hideous modern boxes attached to them. IMO…they’ve devalued the building.