Church Hill People’s News

Church Hill People’s News
news       classifieds       calendar       directory       crime info       about us       contact       advertise       search       subscribe
Advertise on chpn.net

CALENDAR - THIS WEEK
Beginning Computer Classes for Adults
Tue Oct 7 10:30 am
Have computer questions and don't know where to begin? Come by the library and we'll help you get started! East End Libr...
Robert Grey townhall meeting at Peter Paul
Tue Oct 7 6:15 pm
A townhall meeting with mayoral candidate Robert Grey will be held on Tuesday Oct.7 from approximately 6:15–8PM at the...
open mic @ Poe's Pub
Tue Oct 7 8:30 pm
acoustic open mic at Poe's Pub on East Main, hosted by Jim Daab. Sign up is at 8:30, music starts at 9, goes until clos...
Unity Civic League
Thu Oct 9 6:30 pm
@ St. Peter's Development Center 22nd and X Street Call 643-9353 or willieand@aol.com for more info.
2nd annual Long Walk to Freedom
Sat Oct 11 7:30 am
@ Richmond City Jail (1701 Fairfield Way)
Union Hill clean-up
Sat Oct 11 8:45 pm
Meet up at the little take out place on the corner of Jefferson and 22nd Street, then break up into groups to clean up a...

CLASSIFIEDS
10 NEWLY REMODELED TWO-BEDROOM HOMES FOR RENT- ALL NEW APPLIANCES, FIXTURES, HARDWOOD FLOORS, AND LARGE BACK YARD. AVAILABLE FOR MOVE-IN NOVEMBER 1ST BUT WE ARE PRE-LEASING NOW! E-MAIL RBRYAN@FRENCHCC.COM FOR MORE INFORMATION, OR CALL 804.343.4201.
Two bedroom apartment for rent. 2123 E. Marshall St. $650.00/mo + utilities. Recently remodeled with updated kitchen and bath. Great location and lots of parking. Bill Hartsock, 216-3100
For Rent. 618 N 35th. 4 bedroom 2.5 bath, 2,300 SF. Leasing for $1,250 a month. Call Matt for details 804-306-9019.
512 Chimborazo Blvd, 3br 1.5 bth, 1980 sqft, hardwood floors, granite countertops, stainless steel apps, must see! $259,950
single mother with school age child looking for affordable apt. for rent. please call 804 399 9462 or 640 5963
Broyhill Entertainment Center; classic & heavy piece, dark finish. $1000 vcstrader@yahoo.com
FOR SALE: 2 doors, circa 1860. $50 each. One is a solid four panel, the other has four glass pane upper and 2 solid panel lower. Would sell for $100-150 at Caravati's or Cox's. Call 649-1913 or email at info@mysterydinner.com
FREE Antique RCA Stove abaisey@rbvainc.com or 804-649-2162
Free Piano- wonderfully carved, yet needs to be refurbished. Call Bill at 649-3764.
YOUR MESSAGE HERE - Fabric signs, banners & wall hangings for INDOOR use, hand made locally & personalized. $ 50. & up. 804 304 3345. Near Carytown
AGAINST THE GRAIN FURNITURE Discover Northside's furniture secret: beautifully handcrafted right here in Richmond by local folks who love filling your custom orders. AgainstTheGrainVA.com ATGVA@comcast.net 5522 Lakeside Ave 855-1186 Workshop:855-1672
KIDZ -R- COOKIN' We offer 15+ holistic & healthy cooking programs for children ages 5-15 yrs. We bring the kitchen to you! We create unique programs for schools, churches, community centers, troops, and any special event www.kidzrcookin.info 804.651.2974
Need estate sale services? Have items to consign? Since 1999, Susan's Selections has conducted in-home estate sales. Our consignment store at 8008 Staples Mill Rd is open Mon to Fri 10am-6pm, Sat 10am-4pm, Sun 1-4pm. 232-6480 or Roy@SusansSelections.com.
chihuahua lost clay st church hill 10/3/08 blackish dark blue color with white spot on neck and white underneath. approx 7 lbs and 1 yr old. name is inki. please call 869 6690
Free talk to groups on family quilts based on my years of repair. This is not an appraisal or a buy/sell event. Your group, your location. Prefer daytime metro but eves & weekends are fine. Call Custom Crazy Quilts & Repair, 804 304 3345
Missing Chihuahua 1 yr old approx 7 lbs dark blueish with white spot on neck. name is inki. missing from clay st. 10/3/08 4:00 a.m. please call 869 6690 if found
STOLEN-Lhasa Apso, grey/white male, from Petsmart on Libbie/Broad Sat. 9/27. Suspect is man in sky blue pickup truck. Had a blond and white shepherd with him and a chameleon. Reward offered for info leading to the return of the dog. Contact 254-0800 ASAP.




RVA News
Best Community Blog 2007


Richmond Magazine
2007 Editor's Pick
"Media Pleasures"

comment   post to delicous
July 16, 2008

2 houses for Pink Street

The foundations have been dug for a new Better Housing Coalition double house on Pink Street. Only one block long, bound by Venable and Carrington Streets, Pink Street has long been a vacant and raggedy corridor.

The building will back up to a Better Housing Coalition house on Carrington Street and 4 recent BHC houses on short Q Street. The double house will be attached version of an existing BHC design already constructed at 1118 and 1120 North 22nd Street as detached units (shown below).

Posted at 8:45AM under Union Hill | Tags: ,

43 Responses to “2 houses for Pink Street”

  1. posted by Kathryn Wiley at July 16, 2008 12:39 pm :

    I just wanted to take this opportunity to say that the Better Housing Coalition is doing an amazing job in Church Hill!

    Thank you for everything you are doing for new construction up here…it is beautiful, thoughtful, and the best representation of what we need.

    Nice job!!

  2. posted by Laura Daab at July 16, 2008 12:55 pm :

    FANTASTIC! Kudos to the BHC.

    This is precisely the type of new construction that is appropriate for Church Hill/Union Hill.

    Are you listening and looking CAR?

  3. posted by Eric S. Huffstutler at July 17, 2008 9:07 am :

    Yes… this is exactly what we have been striving to get others to understand about architeturally correct designs for the block and neighborhoods. I am still not fond of the smaller 1st floor front windows - think many of this style houses had walk-throughs but still has the overall correct look down to frieze designs!

    Like Laura… CAR, are you taking notes?!?!?

    Eric

  4. posted by Cadeho at July 18, 2008 12:28 am :

    We need houses built like that in Woodville… we have some annoyingly suburban stuff starting to pop up here among old Italianates. But what is up with all the double houses? Not everyone wants to live exactly next to their neighbor.

  5. posted by Eric S. Huffstutler at July 18, 2008 9:11 am :

    May be easier and cheaper to build a double and with the mindset of people today living in condos and high-rises, they already share walls and floors. The double house is a compromise where the builder/owner can make a bigger profit and the people buying them do so knowing they share an interior wall (which should be a firewall and soundproofed anyway) while having some sort of yard and having the feeling of living in a “house”.

    I sure as hell rather see a bunch of Italianate doubles than see a hybrid that can’t make up its mind what style to be other than out of place.

    Eric

  6. posted by Bill Hartsock at July 18, 2008 9:22 am :

    Many times double houses were built because city lots were narrow - generally 24′ wide - and to allow for more living space it was the best alternative.

  7. posted by Eric S. Huffstutler at July 18, 2008 9:42 am :

    Bill… I haven’t noticed but would older doubles that fit into your scenario be only 12-feet wide per side? Seems awful narrow especially when you have a staircase to factor into the front area/room. I have single rooms in my house that are almost as wide as the entire “double house” you describe!

    Eric

  8. posted by john_m at July 18, 2008 9:47 am :

    @ Bill — Same thing on this double. I ran into John Moorefield from BHC and he mentioned the narrowness of the lots in comparison to the other lots.

    @ Eric - Each house is on its own narrow lot, each house would be 24 feet wide.

  9. posted by neighhbor at July 18, 2008 9:47 am :

    Each side was 24′.

  10. posted by Eric S. Huffstutler at July 18, 2008 10:00 am :

    Ahhh… thanks John for the clarification. The way Bill described it I thought people were living in hallways :-)

    Again, just wish CAR would take a few pointers from BHC instead of being so defiant towards what a historic district and its structures are supposed to be.

    Eric

  11. posted by Ramzi at July 18, 2008 9:06 pm :

    Might be nicely made but still boring cookie-cutter products.

  12. posted by hillkid at July 19, 2008 4:34 am :

    Ramzi:

    WRONG!

  13. posted by Ramzi at July 19, 2008 9:34 am :

    You don’t think they’re nicely made?

  14. posted by hillkid at July 19, 2008 11:46 am :

    Ramzi:

    You know what I mean. Of course not. I’m talking about the “boring cookie-cutter products.”

    I respectfully disagree with you.

  15. posted by Bill Hartsock at July 19, 2008 12:10 pm :

    You want cookie-cutter? Go out to the west end of Henrico or anywhere in Chesterfield. That’s cookie-cutter!

  16. posted by Ramzi at July 19, 2008 1:23 pm :

    Taken individually, these houses are fine, they look good, and I’ve heard good things about BHC’s construction quality. As far as low-income housing goes they seem to be better than most. I would just like to see some variety in design instead of virtually the same look every time a new “historic” frame house is put up. Same proportions, same porch, same windows, same corbels = multiple repeated motifs = fresh cookies.

  17. posted by Bugbear at July 23, 2008 2:55 pm :

    They look good to me! BHC tends to do a very nice job. I’m acquainted with some of their folks, and have encouraged them to continue doing work in Union Hill.

    Some of you may have noticed that some OTHER builders have been jamming real monstrosities into our neighborhood over the past few years….. buildings that architecturally might be described as “Victorian double-wide.” We don’t need more of that….

    But not BHC. They’re groovy. Way to go BHC!!!

  18. posted by Laura Daab at July 23, 2008 3:27 pm :

    “Victorian double-wide.”

    I love it! Right on, Bugbear!

  19. posted by Laura Daab at July 23, 2008 3:34 pm :

    The only complaint that I have about BHC houses is that they use asphalt shingles on their porch roofs. I honestly don’t think that it would put a crimp in their building budgets to use metal. Not seamed metal necessarily, but metal nonetheless.

  20. posted by Eric S. Huffstutler at July 23, 2008 4:51 pm :

    Laura… not all houses used metal roofs and I for one am not fond of them hence we took it off of our house. But that was because it was also not correct for the time frame of our house.

    Ramzi… I am not opposed to a variety of designs as long as it doesn’t deviate from “historic” looks that replicate those already on the block. HISTORIC Church Hill has no place for modernistic buildings with only “hints” of historic to them. And I am sure replicating 1880’s brick homes is a bit expensive these days over frame structures but I hope that some will incorporate brick where it is appropriate for the block/street/neighborhood.

    Eric

  21. posted by john_m at July 23, 2008 4:56 pm :

    As a point of detail, notice that the newer and more prominent BHC houses are using brick in the foundation, whereas they used to do cinderblock only.

  22. posted by Back2Hill at July 23, 2008 11:15 pm :

    I may be a new resident thanks to BHC! I absolutely love the homes and the beautiful neighborhoods are seemingly increasing the peace and bringing back the beauty while decreasing the ignorance. I am a previous CH resident soon to return at the beginning of ‘09. I’m a bit concerned about the crime in the area…robberies and such especially around the 26th & O Block and vicinity. I’ve been in the West End for some years now, but I miss the city. Any responses would be helpful…

  23. posted by Laura Daab at July 24, 2008 4:03 am :

    Eric:

    Asphalt shingles are not an appropriate material to be used in OHD’s.

    Under the Guidelines section for Reconstruction and Repair of Roofing page 82 it states:

    “Asphalt shingles are made of felt impregnated with asphalt and covered with colored ceramic or stone granules. This modern roofing material is an inappropriate choice for the majority of historic structures.”

    Under new construction:

    pg. 41 “Materials used in new construction should be compatible with original materials used throughout the surrounding neighborhood.”

    The CAR guidelines clearly state that asphalt is not an appropriate material for original buildings, so asphalt is not compatible with original materials or existing buildings and should not be used in new construction.

  24. posted by john_m at July 24, 2008 7:49 am :

    @ Back2Hill - Check out the crime map. That specific area seems pretty quiet.

    This part of the neighborhood is block-to-block. The 25th Street corridor a little further down has a loitering issue that looks suspicious to me, but whatever is going on there doesn’t affect us over on 23rd and it doesn’t look like 26th & O feels it much either.

    That intersection has seen dramatic change in the past 18 months, and the coming redevelopment at Beckstoffers will only solidify and expand those gains.

  25. posted by Guilty Mom at July 24, 2008 9:22 am :

    Back2Hill-Having lived on 26th and M-ish for the past (almost) 6 years, I can say that I have had no problems. Be smart and know your neighbors, just like anywhere else, and you will be very happy living here.

  26. posted by Eric S. Huffstutler at July 24, 2008 3:20 pm :

    Laura, didn’t say that asphalt shingles are appropriate but metal roofing also isn’t a umbrella cure either as there were various materials used on houses of the 1860s-1890s besides metal. To put red, green, silver metal roofs on every house being built will make it look like cookie cutter housing too.

    Eric

  27. posted by Eric S. Huffstutler at July 24, 2008 3:34 pm :

    Laura…Please don’t take this the wrong way and not wanting to air differences on this thread (and we know the CAR guidelines concerning this material) but I am sure others would like to know why you are so fixated on asphalt shingles? A house can be painted barber pole stripes, have portholes for windows, and tumbleweeds for landscape but if it has asphalt shingles that seems to be the “first” thing you always notice - even on a 2 dimensional sketch. Why? The same for your having a passion for metal roofing as opposed to other materials.

    I am all for correctness but to simply say asphalt is wrong put a metal roof on it doesn’t work either. It needs to be examined on a case-by-case basis for design as the house on the block a fill-in or restoration is copying may also have incorrect roofing (or other elements). That is where historical photographs and research comes in.

    Eric

  28. posted by Laura Daab at July 24, 2008 4:32 pm :

    Eric:

    I realize that there are more materials that were used other than metal, but asphalt shingles wasn’t one of them.

    I’m not sure what you’re talking about with the barber stripe poles and porthole windows thing (unless you’re referring to the 512 N. 28th Street house, in which case, I would not describe it as such).

    Anyway, shingles are not the first thing I notice and if you’ve seen some of my other comments regarding various in-fill, in particular the double houses at the 3100 Block of Marshall, you’d know that was true.

    Metal roofs are used widely up here in Church Hill as is slate and other materials. I am not opposed to a 3 dimensional, high quality slate look or tile look shingles. But for the most part, metal is the main material used on roofs. What’s cookie cutter about it? It’s what’s used over and over again.

    Some of the newer seamed metal roofing materials that are colored do not have the nice patina that older roofs have, but you can choose colors that are more muted and not so raw looking. I’d rather see sheet metal or metal shingles on porch roofs rather than the seamed metal that you see on main roofs.

  29. posted by Eric S. Huffstutler at July 24, 2008 4:57 pm :

    But then again, just because there is a “lot” of houses in Church Hill that have metal roofs doesn’t make it correct - right?

    One person may have started a trend or metal roofs may have been a fashion fad for houses at one time (keeping up with the Jones) but doesn’t mean that when the house was originally built this was what was on the roof. It is what was on it “originally” that I am concerned about. If the house was built in 1830 with a wooden shingled roof but now has metal, I say tear off the metal and replace it back with wooden shingles or something that replicates it. I know that sounds a bit anal but at the same time you can’t pick and choose which guidelines to enforce over others especially when stressing historical accuracy.

    I was being facetious when talking about the barber pole stripes, etc… just making a point about your zooming in on asphalt shingles over everything else and drive it home each time by quoting the CAR codes (which you and I know are a joke).

    I am sure there were houses with cedar shake, slate, ceramic, and other materials as well on these various style houses.

    Eric

  30. posted by Eric S. Huffstutler at July 24, 2008 5:09 pm :

    I also noted that there has been several occasions that CAR has said that it is too late for design changes on various houses. I know when we first moved into Church Hill we lived in fear doing anything outside the rules that CAR or someone would force us to tear it off and redo it to approved specs… guess they don’t actually do that huh?

    So, can we as community citizens know ahead of time when a house is going to be built AND/ OR renovated so opposition to design can be made ‘before” it is too late?

    Eric

  31. posted by Bill Hartsock at July 24, 2008 6:10 pm :

    One of the best general information resources about our neighborhood and its characteristics, as well as building materials, is “Living With History” which was created by the Church Hill Association in 1996. One quote from page 33 is, “Most of the houses have standing seam metal roofs. Slate roofs are the exception. The false mansard roofs tend to be slate in colorful patterns and shapes. Some of the Queen Anne houses have patterned metal roofs.” If you would like a copy, contact CHA or let me know at 216-3100. A copy also comes free with a paid membership!

  32. posted by Eric S. Huffstutler at July 24, 2008 6:45 pm :

    Bill… the key here is that this was written in 1996 - not 1896 so again my statement holds about metal roofs may be of the “norm” in the 20th century but were they true and original in the 19th century?

    I am thinking that many of the original roofs were replaced long before 1996 to metal even if they did not come that way? The author was simply making a statement of their observation in 1996.

    Guess a trip to the Valentine Museum to look at house photos is in order as well as construction permits and insurance policies to see if I am correct?

    But of course one can also look at the old Richmond “house” books and see what were on the roofs of houses listed as demolished long before 1950 - many in the 1890s.

    What do you think? You are more of an historian than most of us here and respect your comments and insight to things!

    Eric

  33. posted by Bob at July 24, 2008 6:58 pm :

    I believe most houses may have had a wood roof. At least on the insurance policy of our house in 1845, it states brick over wood.

  34. posted by Eric S. Huffstutler at July 24, 2008 7:18 pm :

    Bob… did it say brick over wood or brick with a wood roof? The Mutual Assurance policies usually distinguish the difference. The way you put it sounds like you have a brick roof on a wooden house and we know that can’t be right. What I am thinking it is actually saying is that the house has a wooden frame covered with brick. What is the policy number and I’ll take a look. I know with ours it says wood shingled roof.

    Eric

  35. posted by Bob at July 24, 2008 7:54 pm :

    it says brick covered with wood on the drawing of the house. It also shows a kitchen saying the same thing. But for some reason above that it says, ‘Brick covered with wood, and Brick covered with slate.” 1845, it was part of Henrico County, and Broad Street was known as “H” Street on this policy.

  36. posted by Eric S. Huffstutler at July 24, 2008 9:20 pm :

    Then it eludes to a wooden framed roof over a brick structure but doesn’t say what that roof is covered with unless the slate is it? I need to see the policy to know. Who was the owner on the 1845 policy?

    Eric

  37. posted by Bill Hartsock at July 24, 2008 11:50 pm :

    Eric,

    I have owned and restored over twenty houses in the Church Hill/Union Hill area over the last 30 years. Many had the original roofs dating back to the 1850’s, and they were all metal, turn seam roofs. Many times they had been coated and sealed or just painted several times, but they were all in place as originally installed. I think the 1996 citation reflects the history of the neighborhood, rather than current situations. Read the book for yourself and see what else is there that might enlighten you to the neighborhood.

  38. posted by Eric S. Huffstutler at July 25, 2008 1:03 pm :

    It just seems odd that so many houses in Church Hill would have metal roofs where I have noted many Victorian era homes across the country having shingles of various materials. And homes from the early 19th century also having different materials. Was it more of a Church Hill thing? Don’t see it as much in places like Williamsburg or points along Hampton Roads. At least I don’t recall seeing it growing up there.

    The “replaced” metal I can attest happened with our own house probably when they altered the porch areas around 1903. Maybe earlier for the roof but know it was built with wooden shingles and some how ended up with metal which we ripped off and replaced back to something that had the look of a shingle pattern from the street. In fact, I have seen houses being renovated where the shingled roofs were replaced with tin (or the plastic fake crimped tin design) roof so is still going on.

    Eric

  39. posted by Eric S. Huffstutler at July 25, 2008 1:09 pm :

    Bill… your comment “…Read the book for yourself and see what else is there that might enlighten you to the neighborhood ” wasn’t a jab at me was it? I paid you a compliment yet I sense a bit of opposition in that statement.

    Eric

  40. posted by REBECCA at July 25, 2008 1:47 pm :

    eric, you’re annoying.

  41. posted by Eric S. Huffstutler at July 25, 2008 3:24 pm :

    Rebecca… who asked you?

  42. posted by Bill Hartsock at July 25, 2008 4:16 pm :

    Eric,

    You should not be so defensive. I have not attacked you in the past like some others, so don’t start getting your back up with me. Metal was a prime source of roofing material in Richmond, number one because of the availablility of iron ore in Midlothian and, two, because of the rolling mills at Tredegar. It was not used closer to the coast because of the salt in the air, which would rapidly deteriorate the material.

  43. posted by william at July 25, 2008 8:57 pm :

    Actually standing seam tin roofs were very common in 19th century architecture across the country…not just Church Hill, Richmond, or Virginia. Many architectural styles that have slightly pitched or nearly flat roofs use soldered metal or standing seam metal roofs to ensure a water-tight seal. Slate, wood, or shingles will not function well on a flat or low-pitched roof. In winter-time ice will back up under the shingle or pieces of slate and cause water leakage on the interior space. Metal roofs were not used a replacement–they were the originals. The great majority of the homes built in the Richmond area during the 1800’s incorporated a low pitched, shed roof on some part of the structure (usually the main roof). This is very common in Italianate structures and Victorian era row houses. In northern climates, flat roofs are not that common due to excessive snowfalls therefore, more roofing choices were prevalent (slate, cedar shakes, etc.). Metal is a great choice for the homes in Church Hill..It is cost prohibitive for most. Metal installation is a highly skilled , labor intensive process…but the stuff lasts 80-100 years if properly maintained.

Leave a Comment






SEARCH
ARCHIVES

CATEGORIES


Click to view the photos. More info.



advertise on this site!