14 Responses to “still no to SCV”

1. posted by nadine at August 28, 2007 5:18 pm :
   

   I wonder why the SCV only wants to care for the Confederate section? There are other very old graves that need attention in that cemetary: http://www.nbc12.com/news/state/9416486.html

2. posted by bill at August 28, 2007 5:41 pm :
   

   maybe the real question is to ask the city why they will not take care of a city cemetary. but if you are feed up with the bullshit from the city, dont bother and ask cause it will likely be more of the same.

3. posted by Ross at August 28, 2007 6:23 pm :
   

   What about Evergreen?

4. posted by clayb at August 28, 2007 8:25 pm :
   

   Oy. Let’s not talk about Evergreen plz k thnx

5. posted by Amy at August 28, 2007 10:09 pm :
   

   Evergreen isn’t owned by the city, it’s owned by a delinquent management corporation.

6. posted by Rick at August 29, 2007 12:34 pm :
   

   “I wonder why the SCV only wants to care for the Confederate section?” Ya know, as nice as it would be to have someone step up and care for the whole thing, I think it’s great that there is at least a group that wants to pitch in and take a part of the responsibility. It’s a heck of a lot more ownership than there is now, right?

7. posted by archie bunker at August 29, 2007 4:16 pm :
   

   “I wonder why the SCV only wants to care for the Confederate section?”

   Perhaps because their ancestors are buried there?

8. posted by bill at August 30, 2007 1:13 pm :
   

   nadine, i think archie figured it out. why would boys volunteer at the boy scouts? why would republicans volunteer at the republican party? why would a boat owner volunteer at the boat club? why would a bridge player go to a bridge club?

9. posted by Just411ice at August 30, 2007 1:23 pm :
   

   It’s called an opportunistic power-grab along the strategic lines of “low hanging fruit.” When responsibility is not in place, even a landscaping crew can claim authority and one day “rise again.” Nip it in the bud, please.

10. posted by archie bunker at August 30, 2007 2:54 pm :
    

    “It’s called an opportunistic power-grab along the strategic lines of “low hanging fruit.” When responsibility is not in place, even a landscaping crew can claim authority and one day “rise again.” Nip it in the bud, please.”

    Wow.

    I think your tin foil hat is a little too tight.

11. posted by Nordy at August 30, 2007 3:24 pm :
    

    you are right. The confederacy has lain dormant for nigh on a hundred and 50 years, scheming for its return to power via the mechanism of maintaining a decreptit cemetary.

    If someone wants to mow my lawn for free, heck, I will let them. If I dont like them, I can always keep the blinds closed

12. posted by bill at August 31, 2007 9:12 am :
    

    dear scv,

    i am told that there are some dead confederates buried in my yard. could you all come by to clean up my yard and paint my house?

13. posted by mike at September 4, 2007 1:35 pm :
    

    “a landscaping crew can claim authority and one day “rise again.” ”

    And I, for one, welcome our new landscaping overlords….

14. posted by apologies to the original at September 12, 2007 12:08 pm :
    

    There are sticks readily at hand near the cemetery that could be sharpened…

Leave a Comment