32 Responses to “garage has McQuinn in hot water”

1. posted by Old one at May 16, 2007 8:03 am :
   

   Heavens! It’s about time.

   Old

2. posted by towlie at May 16, 2007 8:13 am :
   

   If indeed she was victimized by the citys processes, perhaps she will learn from this and get off her but and actually fight for common sense approaches to solving neighborhood problems.

   Or, she will just retreat into her shell of ignoring other peoples problems, taking credit for progress that happens in spite of her and laying blame on others.

   Either way, I now know where she lives. Anyone have a couple of cases of toilet paper I can borrow for decorative purposes?

3. posted by william at May 16, 2007 9:05 am :
   

   Well, I certainly hope that she is cited and fined for the horrible condition of the property. Not only is the garage a mess but the house is equally bad. This must be the longest “renovation” in history….The condition of the road certainly could not have prevented them from putting windows in the house! The place is an eyesore–fine her!

4. posted by Grrrrrr at May 16, 2007 9:07 am :
   

   Or we could always go after her with sharpened sticks

5. posted by john_m at May 16, 2007 9:07 am :
   

   This must be the longest “renovation” in history

   I’m pretty sure that we’re actually guilty of that.

6. posted by Bill Conkle at May 16, 2007 9:46 am :
   

   I am certainly in the running. 19 years and still working at it.

7. posted by clayb at May 16, 2007 11:20 pm :
   

   Do we have any images? Fan readers want to know!

8. posted by Ruth at May 22, 2007 1:36 pm :
   

   Well, she is cleaning up her garage, but the boards with the nails have only been covered up and her clean-up people are taking garbage cans from the neighborhood to put the trash, leaves and grass cuttings in. I, for one, would appreciate my can back. It is the only one I have.

9. posted by rm at May 22, 2007 3:25 pm :
   

   Ruth…If McQuinn took your Supercan then use the Citizen’s Request form from the city to complain.

10. posted by zack at May 22, 2007 5:00 pm :
    

    The city has a fraud and waste hotline now. Use that!

11. posted by Nordy at May 23, 2007 8:43 am :
    

    Rumor has it that McQuin is also behind all of the chicken bones found in Chimbo Park by my dogs….She sneaks over there in the middle of the night, vampire like, devours whole chickens, and discards the bones willy nilly.

12. posted by zack at May 23, 2007 10:06 am :
    

    OOOOOooooooooooooooooo

13. posted by william at May 23, 2007 10:08 pm :
    

    I wouldn’t doubt that Nordy!

14. posted by Stephen at May 24, 2007 9:27 am :
    

    Tis true, tis true. Last night as I was going to bed, I heard a horrific howling followed by a great cry of chickens in pain. I ventured into the park to investigate and caught a glimpse of our esteemed council person running away. This morn I returned to the site and found chicken bones scattered everywhere.

15. posted by DOUG at May 24, 2007 11:28 am :
    

    You all are some cranky asswipes and disrespectful bastards.

16. posted by Fred at May 24, 2007 4:56 pm :
    

    Comments like these make me work even harder for McQuin and get the “poor people” out to vote when election time rolls around. Out right racist!!

17. posted by Grow up at May 25, 2007 8:46 am :
    

    WHat is racist here? Complaining about her violating the law? Making bad jokes about her?

    Tell me this, what has McQuinn really done for you? Think hard. There are lots of issues that she could tackle. SHe could try to improve schools. She could try to find ways to ease the impact of property tax increases on seinors on fixed incomes. Instead she tries to sue the mayor, refuses to help businesses, and serves as an all around demagogue.

18. posted by inquiring mind at May 25, 2007 11:01 am :
    

    Chicken bones and the usual unsurprising racist cries aside (yawn! it gets old people!)… What I’d like to know is why the wheels of justice move so slowly for the councilwoman. This claim was filed on 4/12/2005 and has been TWICE continued since her FIRST hearing last January. It is currently set again for July 10, 2007.

    Has someone in city administration been looking the other way for more than TWO YEARS? Professional courtesy? Exploitation of the office, perhaps?

    Further, her attorney is registered as “Marsh.” I wonder if it’s Henry.

    Elected officials should strive to be beyond reproach. This seems fishy to me. Prove me wrong.

    The case number is GC05003387-00 if anyone wants to check it out for themselves.

19. posted by NORDY at May 25, 2007 12:05 pm :
    

    For the record, the chicken bones were intended as satire. My dogs do find chicken bones in the park every monday. You are welcome to look yourself. Since Everyone loves to jump on McQuin for other problems, I assigned the bones to here. Chicken bones should not automatically make a comment racist.

    So summarizing,

    McQuinn is a waste of space regardless of her color, she does little other than bread and circuses for her constituency

    Chicken bones are in the park, this is a verifiable fact. They do not readily biodegrade and can potentially choke a dog (having removed a bone from my dogs throat I know this)

    I make bad jokes.

    The racism is in your mind, not mine

20. posted by bill at May 26, 2007 4:10 pm :
    

    I understand that the court date was this past week. So what happened???

21. posted by anne at June 19, 2007 8:48 am :
    

    mcquinn’s building code violation case on her propery at 31st and broad has been continued til July 10th in richmond general district court.
    yet, she can turn around and vote on ordiance 2007-142-104 (old and historic church hill north city of richmond) that makes building codes stricter for other people.
    could this be a conflict of interest or a facade?

22. posted by bill at June 19, 2007 9:32 am :
    

    if you look into it you may find that mcquinn voted on the city ordinance that gives penalties to those that violate existing building, property maintenance violations. mcquinn (1) did not know what she was voting on or (2)does not care that the ordinance is violated.

23. posted by Commentator at June 19, 2007 10:14 am :
    

    I would like to hear McQuinn’s side of the story. She hasn’t been convicted yet. It’s within the realm of possibilities that there is some sort of mitigating circumstance.

24. posted by GRRRRR! at June 19, 2007 10:50 am :
    

    As long as McQuinn plays by the same rules the city expects everyone else to play by.

    Still, I think mob violence would be a lot more fun than an impartial hearing.

25. posted by anne at June 19, 2007 10:55 am :
    

    it is all a facade. the committee of architectural review sent out survey postcards for the church hill north old and historic city of richmond initiative. out of 587 parcels, 138 in favor, 49 against and 9 had no opinion. do the math. how did the CAR get 77% in favor? who would have ever thought that if you did not return your survey postcard that you would have your property rights stripped? just like the kelo supreme court decision, this is just another assault and errosion of property rights. this should have never gotten out of CAR. can you say “railroaded?”

26. posted by john_m at June 19, 2007 11:04 am :
    

    Anne: Can you tack on an initial or something to your name when you post? There is another Anne that posts regularly and I do not want folks to get the 2 of you confused or misattribute any comments that y’all might post.

27. posted by bill at June 19, 2007 11:16 am :
    

    anne, the new city church hill north historic district fit a social need. expansion of the gated south of broad historic district. about the numbers:

    1. the world is run by those that show up and those that fail to respond can only complain abt those running the world

    2. if you do not like the numbers that show up, multiply by zero and add then number you want.

28. posted by archie bunker at June 19, 2007 11:35 am :
    

    Anne — The numbers don’t quite work, but they’re far from outrageous. But, the more serious question is “who is having their property rights stripped?” Are you all worked up because you want to let your garage fall into an egregious state of disrepair (like a certain elected official) or are you upset that you won’t be able to build your McMansion on your 30 foot wide lot?

29. posted by another commentator at June 19, 2007 11:50 am :
    

    Anne, I’m not sure if you realize, but the CAR designation was a grass-roots movement not just supported by postcards, but by people showing up at meetings - public meetings advertized in more places than this blog. I can’t think of a more transparent process. Certainly the decision-makers would have loved to have heard from you a few weeks before now at one of the numerous hearings on this.

30. posted by GRRRRRR at June 19, 2007 1:09 pm :
    

    Wait, I am getting confused by all of these sideline issues. Are or arent we meeting this friday night in Libby Park to form an angry mob?

31. posted by bill at June 19, 2007 3:49 pm :
    

    there is no thing as an “impartial hearing” so the angry mob seems the best way to go. what is the anger about?

32. posted by GRRRRRRR at June 20, 2007 11:53 am :
    

    Not really sure. I just like to form angry mobs periodically. It gives me a chance to drink and brandish primitave weaponry like torches, pitchforks and sharpened sticks.

Leave a Comment