8 Responses to “30th anniversary of the MLK Bridge approaching”

1. posted by john at July 16, 2006 10:36 am :
   

   Some things that come to mind: I wonder what the effect was of moving the east connection from Marshall to O Street, if any. And for 6 years there wasn’t a bridge at all? and — the old viaduct is mentioned in this article about the train tunnel collapse.

2. posted by bill at July 16, 2006 4:25 pm :
   

   MCV is cramped for space and wants to tear down Old West Hospital. The Mosby Court Housing Project should be torn down and an appropriate plan should be put in place to relocate those residents, preferably on the road to home ownership.

   That being said, MCV should build a new hospital where Mosby Court now stands. The MLK Bridge is big enough to handle the traffic of the new hospital and it is really close to MCV’s existing infrastructure. Perhaps a tram could be put in to connect the two facilities.

   This plan would help rejuvenate the area around Mosby Court with new construction and jobs. It would also save the majestic West Hospital from the wrecking ball.

   Let’s do this!

3. posted by james at July 16, 2006 9:25 pm :
   

   I have thought the same for the longest time. The apartments that sit on the edge of the hill, are those RRHA or a private complex? They sit on some prime real estate, and they have an awesome view of the valley and of downtown.

4. posted by citizen at large at July 17, 2006 11:46 am :
   

   Those pieces of property are owned by RRHA. The only problem with your idea is: there is still too much property that is section 8 and other RRHA around that area. I think your idea is still an idea until we can clean that up.

5. posted by bill at July 17, 2006 5:50 pm :
   

   I think any idea will have its challenges. I dont think that the existence of low income housing in the area should be a deal stopper. I think the concept of building world class hospital where Mosby Court now stands might just change that neighborhood for the better. But I am just speculating.

6. posted by Sleepless in the City at August 6, 2006 1:20 pm :
   

   The only people that feel like there is “too much Section 8 and low income housing” are the ones that don’t depend on it for their survival. I wish that someone would address the problems Richmonders are going to face as a result of demolishing housing projects as well as help MANY citizens of the City of Richmond that depend on low income housing and/or Section 8.

   Homeownership is a great prospect for SOME Richmonders. However, many citizens are not financially equipped to handle the ENORMOUS responsibilities that come with homeownership. This is not a realistic option. Retirees just can’t latch onto that type of long range dream. The income that they receive just doesn’t allow for it. Therefore, suggesting that current housing projects be demolished and replaced with housing that is “ownership driven” is not realistic for the pockets of many Richmonders.

   It seems to me that the “City of the Future” is going to very well push out the “Citizens of the Present”. The many ideas that are on the table for the so-called “City of the Future” don’t seeem to have been thoroughly examined to ensure that ALL citizens can remain in the City of Richmond.

7. posted by bill at August 6, 2006 7:13 pm :
   

   Sleepless makes some excellent points and it is true that one of Richmond’s key challenges is maintaining a supply of affordable housing for its citizens. I just dont hold to the vision that poor folks should be segregated in housing projects, that just arent nice places to live, let alone raise a family.

   I agree the issue is much more complex than just tearing down Mosby and building a new hospital. But maybe it should be a part of the conversation. Change is needed. I would like to hear what Sleepless is proposing? Discussion is healthy, but let’s talk about the possibilities to make things better. Peace.

8. posted by bill at August 7, 2006 3:30 pm :
   

   OK, here goes…thanks to sleepless, I dug a little deeper…why not use portions of MCV West Hospital for affordable housing? The old hospital itself could be a mix of condos, offices, retail and low/middle income rental units…right in the heart of downtown. Some residents misplaced by the new hospital could move into the renovated old hospital. The new hospital, placed where Mosby Court currently is located, would serve to rejuvenate that area. The new downtown residents would serve to bring life to the empty streets on evenings and weekends. This idea needs some additional batting around, but it has some merit. Peace.

Leave a Comment